PMO
Price Momentum Oscillator — Carl Swenlin's DecisionPoint PMO line: a doubly-smoothed rate of change.
Quick reference
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Family | Momentum Oscillators |
| Input type | f64 (single close) |
| Output type | f64 |
| Output range | unbounded around zero |
| Default parameters | (smoothing1 = 35, smoothing2 = 20) (Python) |
| Warmup period | 2 |
| Interpretation | Smoothed momentum; zero-line and signal-line crosses are the signals. |
Formula
roc_t = (price_t / price_{t−1} − 1) · 100
smoothed_t = customEMA(roc, smoothing1)_t
PMO_t = customEMA(10 · smoothed, smoothing2)_tcustomEMA is the DecisionPoint smoothing: an exponential average whose smoothing constant is 2 / period (not the textbook 2 / (period + 1)), seeded from its first input. The 1-bar percentage change is smoothed once, scaled by 10, then smoothed again.
The classic PMO signal line is a 10-period EMA of this PMO line. It is deliberately not bundled in — compose it yourself with Chain and an Ema(10).
Parameters
| Name | Type | Default | Valid range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
smoothing1 | usize | 35 (Python) | >= 2 | First smoothing period (applied to ROC). 0 errors with Error::PeriodZero; 1 with Error::InvalidPeriod. |
smoothing2 | usize | 20 (Python) | >= 2 | Second smoothing period (applied to 10 · smoothed). Same error rules. |
smoothing = 1 is rejected because the smoothing constant 2 / 1 = 2 would exceed 1. The Python binding defaults the pair to (35, 20) via #[pyo3(signature = (smoothing1=35, smoothing2=20))]. The periods property returns (smoothing1, smoothing2).
Inputs / Outputs
From crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/pmo.rs:
use wickra::{Indicator, Pmo};
// Pmo: Input = f64, Output = f64
const _: fn(&mut Pmo, f64) -> Option<f64> = <Pmo as Indicator>::update;A single f64 close in, an Option<f64> out. Python maps this to float | None / numpy.ndarray (NaN warmup); Node to number | null / Array<number> (NaN warmup).
Warmup
Pmo::new(s1, s2).warmup_period() == 2. The first ROC needs a previous price, and both customEMAs seed from their very first input, so the first non-None output lands on the second update(). Note this is the first defined value; the doubly-smoothed series only stabilises after many more bars, so treat early readings as unsettled.
Edge cases
- Constant series. A flat series gives
roc = 0on every bar, so both smoothings stay at0and PMO is0.0(constant_series_yields_zeropins this). - Zero previous price. A ratio against a
0.0prior price is undefined;rocis treated as0for that bar. - NaN / infinity inputs. Non-finite inputs are silently dropped; the smoothing chains are not advanced.
- Reset.
pmo.reset()clears the previous price and both EMAs.
Examples
Rust
use wickra::{Indicator, Pmo};
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let mut pmo = Pmo::new(35, 20)?;
println!("{:?}", pmo.update(100.0)); // no previous price yet
println!("{:?}", pmo.update(101.0)); // first defined PMO
Ok(())
}Output:
None
Some(10.0)The first update only records the price. The second produces roc = 1.0%; each customEMA seeds from its first input, so the inner EMA emits 1.0, the ×10 scaling gives 10.0, and the outer EMA seeds at 10.0 — hence PMO = 10.0 on the first defined bar. Early values are seed artefacts: the double smoothing only settles after many more bars. This matches the first_emission_at_second_update test in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/pmo.rs.
Python
import numpy as np
import wickra as ta
pmo = ta.PMO() # (smoothing1=35, smoothing2=20)
prices = 100.0 * 1.01 ** np.arange(120) # steady uptrend
out = pmo.batch(prices)
print("last > 0:", out[-1] > 0)Output:
last > 0: TrueNode
const ta = require('wickra');
const pmo = new ta.PMO(35, 20);
const prices = Array.from({ length: 120 }, (_, i) => 100 * 1.01 ** i);
console.log('last:', pmo.batch(prices).at(-1));Interpretation
Pmo is a smoothed momentum line. The DecisionPoint reads are: PMO crossing its zero line (momentum changing sign), PMO crossing its signal line (a 10-EMA of PMO — build it with Chain), and PMO turning up/down from an extreme. Because the rate of change is taken in percentage terms, PMO values are comparable across instruments — unlike raw Mom.
Common pitfalls
- Trusting the first few values.
warmup_period()is2, but that is only the first defined output — the double smoothing needs many bars to settle. Discard the early ramp. - Expecting a bundled signal line. PMO here is the single PMO line; add
Ema(10)viaChainfor the signal.
References
Carl Swenlin, DecisionPoint Price Momentum Oscillator. The 2 / period "custom smoothing", the ×10 scaling and the conventional (35, 20) periods follow the published DecisionPoint definition.
See also
- Indicator-Roc — the raw rate of change PMO smooths.
- Indicator-Tsi — another double-smoothed momentum oscillator.
- Indicator-Chaining — how to add the signal-line EMA.
- Indicators-Overview — the full taxonomy.